IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24

IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24 - about policy, about Tech, FINANCIAL-24, we has prepared this article well for you to read and retrieve information in it. Okay, happy reading.

IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24

News of a proposed US bill that would legally secure the ever-expanding Internet of Things (IoT) has once again raised the issue of its potential and, moreover, its potential value. Tech experts have been espousing the value of IoT for the last five years, but insiders have also long warned us about its dangers.

Indeed, it's possible to go back to a 2014 article by The Guardian's Tom Brewster in which he points out that many early players in the IoT weren't taking a "security-by-design" approach. At that time, Brewster lamented over the control area network (CAN) bus protocol in vehicles and suggested anyone able to hack into the system could effectively control a company's fleet of trucks, for example.

Recent Ransomware Attacks Put IoT Growth in Danger 

In 2017, issues of CAN vulnerabilities have taken a backseat to more pressing concerns such as ransomware. By its very nature, ransomware is a type of malware that infects a network and encrypts data files until such time that a ransom is paid to the attacker. According to expert breakdowns of ransomware attacks, they take advantage of "human, system and network" vulnerabilities. Based on this, IoT and its myriad of contrasting yet connected devices is an obvious target. That would mean that it would be physical devices and not digital files that criminals will be able to hold hostage and render unusable until the ransom is paid.

Indeed, when WannaCry infected an estimated 200,000 computers across the globe, it compromised the files of 50 NHS hospitals in the UK. As well as highlighting the ever-present danger of ransomware, the 2017 attack called into question the security provisions of a major organization such as the NHS. According to 2015 report by MarketResearch.com, IoT is set to be worth $117 billion in the healthcare sector alone. However, if one of the world's leading healthcare providers can't protect itself from ransomware, that calls into question IoT's place in the sector moving forward.

This threat seems possible to combat, though, and tech experts, academics and even politicians are trying to take the necessary steps. As US senators Cory Gardner and Steve Daines (Republicans) and Mark Warner and Ron Wyden (Democrats), put forward their IoT security proposal in July 2017, they did so with the intention of protecting IoT services used by the US government. Citing "obvious market failure," the senators have taken guidance from experts at the Atlantic Council and Harvard University in a bid to make the government's IoT provisions more secure.

Legislation Makes IoT a More Attractive Investment

Under the proposal, all vendors supplying internet-connected devices to the US government would have to be patchable, compliant with industry security standards and have changeable passwords. Additionally, the bill would expand legal protection for researchers carrying out "good faith" hacks in order to better understand common IoT vulnerabilities. Although the proposals are in their infancy, they are a clear indication of both the need to secure IoT and, moreover, for the need to make it a more viable technology for major organizations such as the US government. The proposed legislation could set a precedent that could be followed across the private sector; something which could then make IoT a more legitimate investment opportunity.

Indeed, current estimates from researchers working with the senators suggest that there could be as many as 30 million devices connected to the internet by 2020. On top of this, IDC predicts that by 2020 IoT's value as an industry could be as much as $7 trillion across the whole IT industry, while a McKinsey Global Institute report estimated IoT could generate $11 trillion in economic value by 2025.

Whichever way you look at it, IoT and the connectedness of internet enabled devices is only moving in one direction. As an investor, this is clearly the market to be in, but only if security issues such as ransomware can be addressed. Moves by the US government are an encouraging start, but more will have to be done if we're to avoid some major cyber catastrophes. When it comes to potential value, IoT is certainly a market tech investors should be hot on right now. However, the industry as a whole must improve if it wants to avoid burning these investors.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect those of EconMatters.


This is the article IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24 this time, hopefully can benefit for you all. well, see you in other article post.

Title : IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24
link : IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24

0 Response to "IoT Investment in Light of Security: Is It a Risky Proposition? - FINANCIAL-24"

Post a Comment